How much of each mineral does the United States import, and how much does it recycle?
Of the 64 minerals USGS gives a net import reliance figure for, the United States met at least half of its 2025 consumption through net imports for 53, and all of it for 16. This page is about the United States only. Net import reliance is imports minus exports as a percent of apparent consumption, so it says nothing about how much any other country imports.
Every figure is from the US Geological Survey's Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026. A figure printed with a greater-than sign (">75") is shown as "more than 75%", and one with a less-than sign as "less than 25%". Minerals marked "on this site" link to their commodity pages; 36 of the 68 are.
Net import reliance, 2025
| Mineral | Net import reliance | Main import sources, 2021-24 | Secondary supply | Change since 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic, all forms | 100% | China, Malaysia, Morocco | — | 0 points |
| Asbestos | 100% | Brazil | — | 0 points |
| Cesium | 100% | China, Germany | — | — |
| Fluorspar | 100% | Mexico, Vietnam, China, South Africa | — | 0 points |
| Gallium | 100% | Canada, Japan, China, Germany | — | 0 points |
| Graphite (natural) | 100% | China, Canada, Mozambique, Mexico | 0% | 0 points |
| Indium | 100% | Republic of Korea, Japan, China, Canada | — | 0 points |
| Manganese | 100% | Gabon, South Africa, Malaysia, Australia | — | 0 points |
| Mica (natural), sheet | 100% | China, Vietnam, Brazil, India | — | — |
| Niobium (columbium) | 100% | Brazil, Canada | — | 0 points |
| Rubidium | 100% | China, Germany, Russia | — | — |
| Scandium | 100% | Japan, China | — | 0 points |
| Strontium | 100% | Mexico, Germany, China | — | 0 points |
| Tantalum | 100% | China, Australia, Germany, Indonesia | — | 0 points |
| Titanium, sponge metal | 100% | Japan, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan | — | — |
| Yttrium | 100% | China, Germany, Austria | — | 0 points |
| Gemstones | 99% | India, Israel, Belgium, South Africa | — | 0 points |
| Xenon | 98% | — | — | — |
| Abrasives, fused aluminum oxide | more than 95% | China, Canada, Brazil, Austria | — | — |
| Nepheline syenite | more than 95% | Canada | — | — |
| Krypton | 93% | — | — | — |
| Bismuth | 92% | China, Republic of Korea, Germany | 8% | 0 points |
| Potash | 92% | Canada, Russia, Israel | — | −1 points |
| Antimony, metal and oxide | 91% | China, Belgium, Thailand, India | 7.8% | +6 points |
| Platinum | 89% | South Africa, Belgium, Germany, Italy | 9.8% | — |
| Titanium mineral concentrates | 88% | South Africa, Canada, Madagascar, Mozambique | — | −2 points |
| Stone (dimension) | 85% | Brazil, Italy, China, India | — | — |
| Iron oxide pigments, natural and synthetic | 84% | China, Germany, Brazil, Canada | — | −3 points |
| Diamond (industrial), stones | 81% | India, South Africa, Russia, Botswana | — | — |
| Peat | 80% | Canada | — | −4 points |
| Chromium, all forms | 79% | South Africa, Kazakhstan, Finland, Canada | 20.8% | +3 points |
| Cobalt | 79% | Norway, Finland, Canada, Japan | 20.8% | +6 points |
| Silver | 77% | Mexico, Canada, Chile, Turkey | 10.6% | +1 points |
| Tin, refined | 77% | Peru, Bolivia, Indonesia, Brazil | 39.5% | −3 points |
| Barite | more than 75% | India, China, Morocco, Mexico | — | — |
| Bauxite | more than 75% | Jamaica, Turkey, Guyana, Australia | — | — |
| Magnesium metal | more than 75% | Israel, Canada, Turkey, Czechia | — | — |
| Rhenium | 75% | Chile, Canada, Germany, Poland | — | +5 points |
| Abrasives, silicon carbide | 74% | China, Brazil | — | — |
| Zinc, refined | 73% | Canada, Mexico, Peru, Republic of Korea | — | — |
| Alumina | 71% | Brazil, Jamaica, Australia, Canada | — | — |
| Garnet (industrial) | 71% | South Africa, Australia, China, India | — | +11 points |
| Rare earths, compounds and metals | 67% | China, Malaysia, Estonia, Japan | — | — |
| Aluminum | 60% | Canada, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, China | — | −1 points |
| Magnesium compounds | 59% | China, Brazil, Canada, Israel | — | +3 points |
| Copper, refined | 57% | Chile, Canada, Peru, Mexico | 2.7% | +13 points |
| Palladium | 57% | South Africa, Russia, Belgium, Canada | 38.5% | — |
| Neon | 52% | — | — | — |
| Germanium | more than 50% | Belgium, China, Canada, Germany | — | — |
| Iodine | less than 50% | Chile, Japan | — | — |
| Lithium | more than 50% | Chile, Argentina | — | — |
| Selenium | more than 50% | Philippines, Mexico, Chile, Poland | — | — |
| Silicon, metal and ferrosilicon | more than 50% | Brazil, Canada, Russia, Malaysia | — | — |
| Tungsten | more than 50% | China, Germany, Bolivia, Vietnam | — | — |
| Nickel | 41% | Canada, Norway, Australia, Brazil | — | +3 points |
| Vanadium | 41% | Canada, Brazil, South Africa, Austria | 57.7% | −20 points |
| Diamond (industrial), bort, grit, and dust and powder | 35% | China, Republic of Korea, Ireland | — | — |
| Mica (natural), scrap and flake | 34% | China, Canada, India, Finland | — | — |
| Lead, refined | 33% | Canada, Republic of Korea, Ireland | 66.7% | −3 points |
| Salt | 31% | Mexico, Chile, Canada, Egypt | — | −6 points |
| Bromine | less than 25% | Israel, Jordan, China | — | — |
| Cadmium | less than 25% | China, Germany, Australia, Peru | — | — |
| Tellurium | more than 25% | Canada, Philippines, Japan, Germany | — | — |
| Vermiculite | 25% | South Africa, Brazil, Zimbabwe, Uganda | — | +7 points |
| Zirconium, ores and concentrates | less than 25% | South Africa, Australia, Senegal | — | — |
| Perlite | 23% | Greece, China | — | 0 points |
| Talc | 22% | Pakistan, Canada, China | — | — |
| Cement | 21% | Turkey, Canada, Vietnam, Greece | — | +2 points |
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Mineral Industry Trends and Salient Statistics (Fig. 2, Fig. 13, Table 7) and the data release. Import sources are the countries USGS lists, in descending order of import share; imports from Hong Kong are counted with China. "Change since 2021" is shown only when USGS prints a plain number for both years.
Recycled supply is not a recycling rate
The "secondary supply" column divides USGS's estimate of secondary production (metal recovered from scrap) by apparent consumption, for the 12 minerals where both are plain numbers in the same unit. USGS defines secondary production differently for each metal: some count only old (post-consumer) scrap, some include new scrap from manufacturing, and the consumption figure also differs by metal. Read the column as an indication of how much of US use is met from scrap, not as a measured recycling rate, and not as a figure for any other country. The minerals with the largest ratios here are lead, refined (66.7%), vanadium (57.7%), tin, refined (39.5%).
Where US scrap goes
More patterns
- Concentration:
- Producer or exporter?:
- Prices in real terms:
- Growth and decline:
- Linked prices and seasons:
- A century of real prices:
- Supplier exposure:
- Trade after export controls:
- Export share history:
- Prices around export controls:
- Export basket prices:
- Substitution coverage:
- Critical risk matrix:
- Country reserve life:
- Prices and cumulative output:
- Data confidence:
- Export controls and bans:
- Chokepoints:
- By-product minerals:
- Peak production:
- Reserves and mining:
- Supply concentration:
- Land or yield?:
- Supply shocks and prices:
- Category price indices:
- Drawdowns and volatility:
- Stocks and prices:
- Which prices follow oil?:
- How reliable is the data?:
- Net exporters and importers:
- Country leaders:
- Export dependency:
- Concentration over time:
- Import dependency:
- Supplier shifts:
- Trade price against benchmark:
- Prices in other currencies:
- Do prices lead each other?:
- Volatility over time:
- Seasonality:
- Price ratios:
- El Niño and prices:
- Who consumes it:
- Self-sufficiency:
- Trade flows:
Every figure is computed from the same tables as the commodity pages. The full set is in patterns.json, and single facts from it appear each day on the facts page.