Commodity Origins

When world output falls, do prices rise?

Not across crops as a group. In the 719 crop-years since 1993 in which a priced crop's world output changed, the real price rose in 51% of the 109 years when output fell by 3% or more, in 45% of the 303 years when it barely moved and in 51% of the 307 years when it rose. The rank correlation between the change in output and the change in price across all cases is 0.00.

That is a surprising result and deserves caution rather than a conclusion; a few individual crops do show a link, in both directions (see the crop-by-crop table). Annual world output is a blunt measure: a shortage in one region can be offset by stocks or by another region, a price can anticipate the shortfall before the harvest, and one year's average price blends the months before and after. Prices are also driven by demand, energy costs, currencies and policy, none of which are held constant here. What the table does show is that a fall in world output is not, on its own, a reliable signal of a higher price in the same year.

Real price change by size of change in world output
Years whenCasesMedian price change, same yearPrice roseMedian price change, next year
World output fell 3% or more109+0.4%51%+3.9%
Output within ±3%303−1.7%45%+0.3%
Output rose 3% or more307+0.6%51%−2.9%

Next-year price changes lean the other way: a median of +3.9% after an output fall and −2.9% after a rise. That is consistent with prices partly reverting, but it is a median over many different crops and is not a forecast.

Change in world output against change in real price, every crop-yearScatter of 719 crop-years. The horizontal axis is the percentage change in world output, the vertical axis the percentage change in the real price. The points form a rounded cloud centred near zero with no visible slope.Change in world output, % (axis clipped at ±40)Change in real price, % (clipped at ±100)-40-2002040-100-50050100
Each dot is one crop in one year, 24 crops from 1993 to 2024.

The largest output falls

Largest one-year falls in world output and the price change
CropYearWorld outputReal price, same yearNext year
Tobacco1998−23%−7%−11%
Coconut oil1999−23%+10%−41%
Tobacco1994−23%−4%−3%
Barley2010−18%+21%+27%
Coconut oil2011−17%+49%−37%
Sorghum1993−17%−6%+2%
Coconut oil1996−16%+9%−15%
Sorghum2009−15%−27%+8%
Coconut oil2002−14%+30%+9%
Coconut oil2020−14%+36%+55%
Cotton2015−14%−15%+4%
Peanuts2006−13%−3%+39%
Sorghum1997−13%−29%−12%
Barley1995−13%+39%+12%

Crop by crop

Rank correlation between output change and price change, for crops with at least 20 years: from -0.66 (sunflower oil) to 0.42 (rice). With 20 to 30 years each, values between about −0.35 and 0.35 are indistinguishable from noise, so read only the extremes.

Output-price rank correlation by crop
CropRank correlationYears
Sunflower oil-0.6620
Lamb-0.3732
Palm kernel oil-0.2827
Coffee-0.2632
Coconut oil-0.2431
Soybeans-0.2232
Cocoa-0.2032
Palm oil-0.1831
Sugar-0.1631
Barley-0.0827
Oranges-0.0832
Tea-0.0132
Bananas0.0832
Canola0.1021
Beef0.1332
Corn0.1332
Wheat0.1832
Sorghum0.2427
Chicken0.2732
Peanuts0.2732
Tobacco0.3032
Natural rubber0.3725
Cotton0.4231
Rice0.4232

World output: FAOSTAT, sum of reporting countries, from 1992 (earlier, the country coverage of the sum changes with the breakup of the USSR and Yugoslavia). Price: World Bank Pink Sheet primary benchmark, calendar-year average, deflated by the US consumer price index to 2024 dollars; only complete years. Crops whose production series is a proxy (orange juice, cardamom) are excluded. This measures association, not cause.

More patterns

Every figure is computed from the same tables as the commodity pages. The full set is in patterns.json, and single facts from it appear each day on the facts page.